# DeepSeek Coder 33B vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#196); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-33b-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 41.8 to 38.0.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 37.7 |
| Rank | — | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | 145.85 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#196); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.