# DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

> Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#199); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-33b-vs-llama-3-1-nemotron-70b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 37.0 |
| Rank | — | 199 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | 38.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | 48.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1272 |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1266 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1271 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1242 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1227 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1252 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1239 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#199); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.