# DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

> Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#275); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-33b-vs-gemma-1-1-7b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 37.4 to 31.0.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 30.7 |
| Rank | — | 275 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180)
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 75% | 35.4% |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1084 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1071 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | — |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1107 |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1060 |
| LMArena French | — | 1064 |
| LMArena German | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 971 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1049 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1057 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1056 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1059 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1040 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#275); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.