# DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-33b-vs-gemini-3-1-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 42.7 to 37.4.
- DeepSeek Coder 33B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 56.7 |
| Rank | — | 20 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: 37.4 (#180)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 75.6% |
| DeepSWE | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1446 |
| SciCode | — | 58.9% |
| GSO | — | 22.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 72.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1483 |
| MirrorCode | — | 8.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,161 |
| AlgoTune | — | 2.02 |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80.2% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 35.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 26% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.8% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 22% |
| BALROG | — | 57% |
| ExploitBench | — | 26.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1211 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 77% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,774 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 95.74 | 154.92 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 77.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 79.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 97.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 55% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 36.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 79.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 14.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1484 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.1% |
| LMCA | — | 53.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59 |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 59.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 86.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1485 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 36.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 16.7% |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 46.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 73.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1484 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1296 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 26.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 26.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1528 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1491 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1494 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1496 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1465 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 20.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 16.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1480 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1486 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71.