# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Phi-3.5-mini

> Neither DeepSeek Coder 1.3B nor Phi-3.5-mini has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Phi-3.5-mini in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.6 to 31.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 22.8% for DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and 32.8% for Phi-3.5-mini.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 36.9 |
| Rank | — | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287)
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | 38.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 4.4% | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Neither DeepSeek Coder 1.3B nor Phi-3.5-mini has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Phi-3.5-mini share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.