# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 31.2.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 50.3 |
| Rank | — | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.