# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Mercury 2.5

> Neither DeepSeek Coder 1.3B nor Mercury 2.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-mercury-2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 30.2 |
| Rank | — | — |
| Context | — | 260K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282)
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Mercury 2.5: 22.4

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Mercury 2.5?

Neither DeepSeek Coder 1.3B nor Mercury 2.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.