# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs GPT-5 Nano

> GPT-5 Nano has enough public results to be ranked (#234); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-gpt-5-nano
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Nano in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 33.4 |
| Rank | — | 234 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282)
- GPT-5 Nano: 33.3 (#248)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 34.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 38.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1351 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 718.67 |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 25.6 (#99)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 21.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 51.5% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 16.4 (#291)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | 139.39 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 2.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 20.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 27% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1329 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| DTBench | — | 62.7% |
| LMCA | — | 7.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.1 |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 29.1 (#221)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 20% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 81.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 12% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 54.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 35.8 (#166)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 69.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 11.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 77.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1321 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 30.7 (#102)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1159 |
| VPCT | — | 37.2% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 45.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1355 |
| LMArena German | — | 1329 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1296 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 75.2 (#72)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 93.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1306 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 31.3 (#275)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 44.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1313 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GPT-5 Nano: 39.4 (#244)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1250 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 705 |
| WildBench | — | 80.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1311 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than GPT-5 Nano?

GPT-5 Nano has enough public results to be ranked (#234); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or GPT-5 Nano better for coding?

GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and GPT-5 Nano share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Nano has 48.