# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V has enough public results to be ranked (#133); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.6V leads 40.2 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 34.5 | 40.9 |
| Rank | — | 133 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 30.7 (#282)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1368 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 62.18 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1372 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1341 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1351 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1359 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V has enough public results to be ranked (#133); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and GLM-4.6V share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.