# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Gemma 3 1B

> Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-gemma-3-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 21.1 |
| Rank | — | 353 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287)
- Gemma 3 1B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 19.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Gemma 3 1B?

Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Gemma 3 1B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.