# DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

> Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-1-3b-vs-gemini-1-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 27.3 |
| Rank | — | 332 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287)
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | 61.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | 117.04 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
| DTBench | — | 45.9% |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 25.8% | 70% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —
- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?

Gemini 1.0 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#332); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.