# DBRX vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 87.9% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 311 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.