# DBRX vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

> Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-qwen3-5-122b-a10b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 311 | 119 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $3.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1436 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1360 |
| SciCode | — | 35.6% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1421 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 51.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 51.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84.3% |
| LMCA | — | 32.2% |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1432 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.2% |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1400 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1442 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1367 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1400 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1424 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1399 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1410 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1368 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1416 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.