# DBRX vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.3 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 63.8% for Qwen3 14B.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 311 | 225 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen3 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.