# DBRX vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> DBRX and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 33.7.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 307 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

DBRX and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is DBRX or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.