# DBRX vs phi-3-medium 14B

> DBRX and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DBRX leads 14.9 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 307 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 17.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than phi-3-medium 14B?

DBRX and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is DBRX or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.