# DBRX vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 14.9.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 311 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1291 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1272 |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1305 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.