# DBRX vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 311 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1444 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1405 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.