# DBRX vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.9 to 33.7.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 307 | 137 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.