# DBRX vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 33.6.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 50.3 |
| Rank | 311 | 49 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1493 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | DBRX | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.