# DBRX vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

> Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-llama2-70b-steerlm-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 6 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 24.3.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 311 | 268 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1025 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1047 |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1072 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1063 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1060 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 998 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1058 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.