# DBRX vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 84.2% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 311 | 70 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 84.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1439 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1403 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.