# DBRX vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 33.7.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 307 | 56 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1413 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.