# DBRX vs GLM-5V-Turbo

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-glm-5v-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.6 to 33.7.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 43.1 |
| Rank | 307 | 86 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1467 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1443 |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1440 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1451 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1422 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1432 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.