# DBRX vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.8 to 33.7.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 307 | 133 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1390 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1368 |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1372 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1426 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1341 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1351 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1359 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and GLM-4.6V share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.