# DBRX vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.5 to 14.9.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 311 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1347 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1354 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1353 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | DBRX | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1332 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and GLM-4.5V share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.