# DBRX vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

> Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-gemini-2-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 57.0 to 33.7.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 36.4 |
| Rank | 307 | 208 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#167)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1373 |
| WeirdML | — | 35.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 325.9 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 27.8 (#89)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 36.9% |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 21.5 (#196)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1377 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.5% |
| DTBench | — | 62.8% |
| LMCA | — | 18.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.93 |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 35.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1373 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 48% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1373 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.9% |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.6 (#109)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1198 |
| VPCT | — | 30% |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.5 (#129)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1369 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1404 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | 1388 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1359 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.2 (#163)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1366 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#257)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 47.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 57.0 (#130)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1379 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1367 |
| WildBench | — | 81.8% |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better for coding?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33.