# DBRX vs Seed 2.0 Pro

> Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-dola-seed-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and Seed 2.0 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 33.6.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | ByteDance Seed |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 43.2 |
| Rank | 311 | 96 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1472 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1453 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 57.1% |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1439 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- DBRX: —
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1274 |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1441 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1489 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1442 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1411 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1449 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1460 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1428 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | DBRX | Seed 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1406 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1441 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than Seed 2.0 Pro?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or Seed 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and Seed 2.0 Pro share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Seed 2.0 Pro has 20.