# DBRX vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

> DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-deepseek-v4-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4 Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 59.5 to 14.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 91.7% for DeepSeek V4 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 54.3 |
| Rank | 311 | 31 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.98 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.9 (#266)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1470 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.6% |
| FrontierCode | — | 28.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1582 |
| SciCode | — | 51% |
| WeirdML | — | 66.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,403 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DBRX: —
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 47.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,285 |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 21.4 (#222)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1461 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 61.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 53.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 91.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 47% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 43% |
| DTBench | — | 93.9% |
| LMCA | — | 45.5% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 40% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.31 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.1 |

## Math

- DBRX: 24.3 (#269)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1455 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 76.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 50% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#294)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 91.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | 1464 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.6% |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.3 (#268)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1486 |
| LMArena French | 1096 | 1472 |
| LMArena German | 1057 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | 1447 |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | 1453 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | 1458 |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.5 (#270)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1448 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#258)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1458 |
| CL-bench Life | — | 13.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.6 (#275)
- DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1451 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1446 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1467 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1553 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1166 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than DeepSeek V4 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or DeepSeek V4 Pro better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and DeepSeek V4 Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48.