# DBRX vs DeepSeek LLM 67B

> DBRX is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-deepseek-llm-67b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 7 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where DBRX leads 22.3 to 8.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 32.9% for DBRX and 24.6% for DeepSeek LLM 67B.

## Snapshot

| | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 24.8 |
| Rank | 307 | 341 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DBRX: 32.3 (#262)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | 1096 |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DBRX: 20.5 (#218)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1070 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 110.54 |

## Math

- DBRX: 22.3 (#265)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1145 | 1108 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 6.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.8% |

## Knowledge

- DBRX: 14.9 (#289)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 24.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |

## Multilingual

- DBRX: 29.4 (#263)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | 1073 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1095 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DBRX: 57.7 (#265)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | 1079 |

## Long Context

- DBRX: 33.7 (#253)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | 1092 |

## Writing & Preference

- DBRX: 33.7 (#271)
- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | DBRX | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | 1105 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | 1067 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | 1082 |

## FAQ

### Is DBRX better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?

DBRX is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DBRX or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?

DBRX scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DBRX and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.