# Command R7B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r7b-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 37.5 to 26.1.
- Command R7B is cheaper at $0.0375 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 50.3 |
| Rank | — | 49 |
| Context | 128K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.0375 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R7B: 26.1
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 32.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1512 |

## Math

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1494 |

## Knowledge

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1543 |

## Multimodal

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |

## Multilingual

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1493 |

## Long Context

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1501 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R7B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Command R7B | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1464 |

## FAQ

### Is Command R7B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); Command R7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, Command R7B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Command R7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.0375 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R7B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R7B has 1 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.