# Command R vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 25.8 to 13.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 32.6 |
| Rank | 267 | 242 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1236 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1220 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1233 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Command R | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1252 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.