# Command R vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 54.0 to 38.4.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.80 for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 267 | 180 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1366 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1334 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Command R | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1342 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Trinity Large Thinking?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Trinity Large Thinking lists at $0.25 and $0.80.

### Is Command R or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.