# Command R vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 25.8.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 267 | 207 |
| Context | 128K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Step 3.7 Flash?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

### Is Command R or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.7 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.