# Command R vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

> Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-step-1o-turbo-202506
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 53.4 to 38.4.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 267 | 160 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1339 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1318 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1308 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1380 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1315 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1311 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1350 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)

| Benchmark | Command R | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1308 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1341 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.