# Command R vs Qwen2-72B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2-72B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 45.2% for Command R and 54% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 272 | 300 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 54% |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1191 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1235 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | 82.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1170 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1181 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1196 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Qwen2-72B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Qwen2-72B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.