# Command R vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads 20.7 to 13.8.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.9 |
| Rank | 272 | 302 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $2.80 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $8.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.