# Command R vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 27.6 to 13.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 81.1% for Qwen Plus.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 267 | 204 |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1328 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 46.4% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 24% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1303 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Command R | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Qwen Plus?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.

### Is Command R or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Qwen Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.