# Command R vs Phi-4 Mini

> Command R and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-phi-4-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Phi-4 Mini leads 22.4 to 13.8.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 30.9 |
| Rank | 272 | 283 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.075 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Phi-4 Mini: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Phi-4 Mini?

Command R and Phi-4 Mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 30.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Phi-4 Mini?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Is Command R or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Command R scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.