# Command R vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-phi-3-mini-128k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 6 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Command R leads 38.2 to 27.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 37.1% for Command R and 29.6% for Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 272 | 305 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | 40.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1028 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1089 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 984 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1016 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1039 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1059 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1023 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 996 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Command R | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 989 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.