# Command R vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Data Analysis: 33.3% for Command R and 20.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 272 | 304 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | 22.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | 13.6% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Command R | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.3 vs 28.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.