# Command R vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 30.5 to 19.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 267 | 248 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1208 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.