# Command R vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 29.3.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 272 | 244 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Command R: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.