# Command R vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

> Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-nemotron-4-340b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 22.4 to 13.3.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 35.3 |
| Rank | 267 | 218 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1209 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 22.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1202 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.7 (#193)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1216 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 31.4 (#212)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 38.0 (#228)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1214 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1196 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1195 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.3 (#227)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1203 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#216)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1225 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.9 (#229)

| Benchmark | Command R | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1214 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.