# Command R vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 38.2.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 272 | 131 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1417 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1386 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1375 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Command R | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Command R or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.