# Command R vs Mistral Small 3.2

> Command R and Mistral Small 3.2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-mistral-small-3-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.1 to 38.4.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 267 | 271 |
| Context | 128K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.0938 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.73 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1161 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Command R and Mistral Small 3.2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.