# Command R vs Mistral Small 3.1

> Command R and Mistral Small 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-mistral-small-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 28.0 to 14.7.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $0.56 for Mistral Small 3.1.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.7 |
| Rank | 272 | 269 |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.56 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1309 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1278 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.48 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1262 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 3.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 24.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1257 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 61% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 39.2% |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1253 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1266 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1208 |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | 1283 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1264 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 75% |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1299 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Small 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1277 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1253 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1270 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 761 |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Command R and Mistral Small 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Mistral Small 3.1?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 lists at $0.35 and $0.56.

### Is Command R or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.