# Command R vs Mistral Medium 3.1

> Command R and Mistral Medium 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-mistral-medium-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 38.2.
- Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 272 | 266 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

| Benchmark | Command R | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Command R and Mistral Medium 3.1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Medium 3.1 does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.