# Command R vs Ministral 3B

> Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-ministral-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 2 categories and Ministral 3B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 46.4% for Command R and 51.7% for Ministral 3B.
- Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- Ministral 3B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 26.2 |
| Rank | 272 | 338 |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Command R: 29.3 (#306)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.8 (#331)
- Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 46.4% | 51.7% |
| LMCA | 9.2% | 5.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.1 |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 28.0 (#246)
- Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 14.4% |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 31.0 (#221)
- Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 25.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.7 (#245)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | — |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.1 (#261)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#231)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.2 (#254)
- Ministral 3B: —

| Benchmark | Command R | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than Ministral 3B?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Command R's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and Ministral 3B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.