# Command R vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/command-r-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 38.4.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Command R.
- MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 267 | 91 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.15 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.60 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Command R: 28.8 (#301)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1170 | 1467 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Command R: 13.3 (#329)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1445 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |

## Math

- Command R: 25.8 (#244)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1432 |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Command R: 30.5 (#219)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | 1449 |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Command R: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Command R: 35.9 (#240)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | 1161 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1176 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | 1162 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1150 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Command R: 58.3 (#256)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1428 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |

## Long Context

- Command R: 36.3 (#226)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Command R: 38.4 (#248)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Command R | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1446 |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Command R better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Command R or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Command R lists at $0.15 and $0.60.

### Is Command R or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Command R and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.